Monday, August 17, 2009

GREED, LIES, AND GULLIBILITY: PAUL KRUGMAN TELLS IT LIKE IT IS


To those of you who seek out my ruminations from time to time on my blog, I extend to you my apologies for not maintaining my average periodic contribution to the political discourse of our time in recent weeks. The truth is that I have been taking it easy this summer, primarily eating, drinking, reading and observing.

I have also just completed a comfortable 11 day cruise of the Baltic on the Eurodam during which I walked the medieval streets of Tallinn Estonia, marveled at the excesses of the Romanov dynasty in St. Petersberg, became awestruck by Finnish beauties sipping wine or cappuccino in the sidewalk restaurants of Helsinki, stood agape at the gorgeous island vistas of Stockholm, and ate bad food at the Tivoli Gardens in Copenhagen.

I also had the misfortune to be among almost 2000 American tourists on the ocean liner. I spoke to many of them and had the bad luck to draw several as dining room campanions while on the cruise. A more ill-informed, parochial, and self-centered bunch I hope you will never have the bad luck to meet.

I weep for President Obama at the many tasks he has ahead of him in his quest to drag much of American society kicking and screaming into the 21st century. Let all of us pray - and I'm am not a religious person but by God in this case I am - that he survives all of the insane perils and hate-mongers that lurk around every corner, in every hall, in every crowd and on every network, that can do him and his administration in in an instant.

However, there are intelligent voices of reason in the United States, one of which is Nobel prize-winning economist and columnist with the New York Times Paul Krugman. His piece published yesterday in the New York Times is brilliantly coherent and accurate and is a welcome injection of sanity in the screwed-up debate on Health Care that is taking place in his screwed-up country.

Here it is:

Op-Ed Columnist
The Swiss Menace
By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: August 16, 2009

It was the blooper heard round the world. In an editorial denouncing Democratic health reform plans, Investor’s Business Daily tried to frighten its readers by declaring that in Britain, where the government runs health care, the handicapped physicist Stephen Hawking “wouldn’t have a chance,” because the National Health Service would consider his life “essentially worthless.”
Professor Hawking, who was born in Britain, has lived there all his life, and has been well cared for by the National Health Service, was not amused.

Besides being vile and stupid, however, the editorial was beside the point. Investor’s Business Daily would like you to believe that Obamacare would turn America into Britain — or, rather, a dystopian fantasy version of Britain. The screamers on talk radio and Fox News would have you believe that the plan is to turn America into the Soviet Union. But the truth is that the plans on the table would, roughly speaking, turn America into Switzerland — which may be occupied by lederhosen-wearing holey-cheese eaters, but wasn’t a socialist hellhole the last time I looked.

Let’s talk about health care around the advanced world. Every wealthy country other than the United States guarantees essential care to all its citizens. There are, however, wide variations in the specifics, with three main approaches taken.

In Britain, the government itself runs the hospitals and employs the doctors. We’ve all heard scare stories about how that works in practice; these stories are false. Like every system, the National Health Service has problems, but over all it appears to provide quite good care while spending only about 40 percent as much per person as we do. By the way, our own Veterans Health Administration, which is run somewhat like the British health service, also manages to combine quality care with low costs.

The second route to universal coverage leaves the actual delivery of health care in private hands, but the government pays most of the bills. That’s how Canada and, in a more complex fashion, France do it. It’s also a system familiar to most Americans, since even those of us not yet on Medicare have parents and relatives who are. Again, you hear a lot of horror stories about such systems, most of them false. French health care is excellent. Canadians with chronic conditions are more satisfied with their system than their U.S. counterparts. And Medicare is highly popular, as evidenced by the tendency of town-hall protesters to demand that the government keep its hands off the program.

Finally, the third route to universal coverage relies on private insurance companies, using a combination of regulation and subsidies to ensure that everyone is covered. Switzerland offers the clearest example: everyone is required to buy insurance, insurers can’t discriminate based on medical history or pre-existing conditions, and lower-income citizens get government help in paying for their policies. In this country, the Massachusetts health reform more or less follows the Swiss model; costs are running higher than expected, but the reform has greatly reduced the number of uninsured. And the most common form of health insurance in America, employment-based coverage, actually has some “Swiss” aspects: to avoid making benefits taxable, employers have to follow rules that effectively rule out discrimination based on medical history and subsidize care for lower-wage workers.

So where does Obamacare fit into all this? Basically, it’s a plan to Swissify America, using regulation and subsidies to ensure universal coverage.

If we were starting from scratch we probably wouldn’t have chosen this route. True “socialized medicine” would undoubtedly cost less, and a straightforward extension of Medicare-type coverage to all Americans would probably be cheaper than a Swiss-style system. That’s why I and others believe that a true public option competing with private insurers is extremely important: otherwise, rising costs could all too easily undermine the whole effort.

But a Swiss-style system of universal coverage would be a vast improvement on what we have now. And we already know that such systems work.

So we can do this. At this point, all that stands in the way of universal health care in America are the greed of the medical-industrial complex, the lies of the right-wing propaganda machine, and the gullibility of voters who believe those lies.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/17/opinion/17krugman.html?src=twt&twt=nytimesopinion

4 comments:

Raymaker said...

Welcome back...did you bring me back anything???

John Prince said...

Welcome back Darryl, I missed you!

Thought your comments about the Americans on your cruise ship was potent, but sad and true. A book I read years ago from back in the fifties called 'The Ugly American' unfortunately, still rings true today. It is amazing to me how such a powerful people can be so xenophobic in their outlook and dealings with the rest of the world, while constantly talking about 'freedom', 'democracy' and 'equality', when most of them haven't a clue what those words really mean, as they are regularly lead to the slaughter (their own and others they come in contact with).

Excellent article by PAUL KRUGMAN. Thanks for sharing!

Darryl Raymaker said...

Raymaker:
Did I buy you anything? Did I buy you anything? Jesus, did you buy me anything?????

John:
Your comments are appreciated as usual. I've always like Krugman's stuff. He tells it like it is!

office said...

Microsoft Office 2010
Office 2010
Microsoft Office 2007
Office 2007
Microsoft Office
Office 2007 key
Office 2007 download
Office 2007 Professional
Microsoft outlook
Microsoft outlook 2010